![]() |
“‘Where are the carriers?’ This has been the likely first question asked by every President of the United States since World War II when faced with a developing international crisis that involves U.S. interests.”
So begins best-selling author Tom Clancy’s Carrier. Clancy goes on to write that “Aircraft carriers stretch perceptions. First of all, they’re big – bigger than most skyscrapers – skyscrapers that can move across the sea at a better than a fair clip.” Modern carriers are well over 1,000′ feet long and weigh an astonishing 100,000 tons…or more.
They are also incredibly expensive, costing $4 billion or more to build, so they’re well-protected by supporting defense ships. A carrier battle group may involve a $20 billion investment. The modern carrier boasts a staggering array of electronics and sensors, sophisticated radar and down-to-the-meter GPS navigation. These massive mini-cities carry thousands of men, each with a job that serves to keep the carrier, powered by a nuclear reactor, operating at top efficiency. And we haven’t even begun talking about the aircraft.
But it’s the aircraft that gives the carrier its punch. In fact, the aircraft are the offensive and defensive centerpiece of the modern fleet. A modern airplane’s ability to attack targets from hundreds of miles away as well as defend the fleet from attack at distances of hundreds of miles are the reason that 100,000-ton carriers are feasible in the first place.
This is nothing new to us…we’re now 70+ years into the “carrier-era”, and we don’t need to be sold on the idea. But of course, it wasn’t always like this.
In the 1920’s, there was an ideological battle being fought in the U.S. Navy, and in other navies as well. For many, the battleship with its supporting cast was the ultimate form of naval warfare. The navy with the most iron and the biggest guns was master of the sea. But a new line of thinking was emerging…one that contended that the airplane (still in its infancy as a military weapon) could add a long-reaching punch to existing naval power. If an airplane could be launched from a ship, fly out, and safely return, that would be a real surprise to an enemy.
By the early 1930’s the concept had already been proven feasible, with the collier-to-carrier USS Langley offering a primitive glance at the possibilities. The Lexington and Saratoga, carriers of legend, were next. These began life as battle-cruisers, but early on were converted and served with distinction when the U.S. entered the war in 1941.
But the USS Ranger, the fourth carrier built, was different. It didn’t start life as a battle-cruiser, a battleship, or a battle-anything. First launched on February 25, 1933 (and commissioned the following year), CV-4 (in Navy-speak) was built from the ground up as an aircraft carrier.
If the Navy was not fully sold on the potential of the carrier replacing the battleship as its “dreadnought”, it certainly recognized that the carrier offered long-range offensive capability and a much improved defense for its traditional big iron.
It would take 10 years for carrier and aircraft technology to mesh and, in the meantime, several more advanced classes of battleships would enter the water, but by the end of the Second World War, the carrier had ascended to preeminence. It was no longer the concept of the “carriers protecting the battle-group”…rather it was “the battle-group that protected the carriers.”
But believe it or else, the USS Ranger lived long enough to see that day, surviving the War as the first purpose-built aircraft carrier. Rapid advancements in carrier design, however, meant that she would be the only Ranger-class carrier built.
Recommended Reading: Carrier: A Guided Tour of an Aircraft Carrier